Untitled Document
There’s a huge check tacked to the wall of
Rebecca Winer’s office. Huge in the sense that it’s
literally a big check, the sort that lottery officials are so fond of
handing out to stunned winners, who pose with appropriate
deer-in-the-headlight expressions as PR photos are snapped.
Sadly for Winer, she’s no Powerball winner.
Instead, the watershed planner with the Ellicott City based non-profit
Center for Watershed Protection keeps the novelty check (which is made out
in the amount of $12,000) solely for chuckles. “That’s our
obnoxiousness, actually,” she tells me mystifyingly.
Since 1992 the Center has been using funds from a range
of sources, like the Chesapeake Bay Trust (who issued Winer’s
souvenir, and most likely a smaller companion to be cashed), in their
efforts to protect watersheds. In those eleven years the group has
weathered a growth spurt LeBron James would be envious of.
“Actually, it was just me to start out with,” says the
Center’s executive director, Tom Schueler. “We’ve
grown from a staff of pretty much nothing, to eighteen.”
Today the organization’s staff members have
academic backgrounds that skew heavily towards the scientific – even
their financial officer holds an environmental degree. And all of
that knowledge is pointed collectively towards a “multi-disciplinary
strategy to watershed protection,” as stated by their mission.
What that means is a multi-pronged approach to protecting that stream
that runs through your neighborhood that includes planning, restoration,
research, stormwater management, education, and training.
What that means is that the Center works with whoever
needs their help in protecting or restoring watersheds: citizens,
governments, developers – you name it. The Center seems to do
it all, stopping just shy of getting entangled in matters of public policy.
“We focus on creating the research and then
disseminating it,” says the Center’s communications director,
Heather Holland, perhaps the group’s only employee without a degree
in science. Holland explains that the Center performs a good deal of
fee-for-service work. “That means, for instance, the city of
Burlington, Vermont, will hire us to do a stream assessment.”
She estimates that there are about 3500 watershed groups in the
country. “Our job is to get these technical resources to these
people so they can make a difference in their local watersheds.”
While Holland is obviously excited about the growth of
the organization, she stops well short of gloating: an increased demand on
the Center’s services is a sure sign there’s a lot of work to
be done to protect watersheds.
The East Coast Bias
Included in the Center’s 2001-2002 annual report
is a bright yellow map of the United States. Places where the
organization has done work are noted with red stars, most of which are
concentrated in the mid-Atlantic region. The Center is pretty
up-front about the East Coast bias; after all that’s where
they’re located, and there’s not as drastic a need for
watershed protection in the more arid Western side of the country.
Interestingly, what the staff of the Center realizes is
that at the mere mention of watersheds, eyes tend to glaze over.
“Sometimes the problems we’re dealing with make you want
to cry. Because the issues can be complex and sometimes kind of dry
to the average person, we try to use humor to get those messages
across,” says Schueler.
What Schueler fears many people don’t realize is
that everybody lives in a watershed, which is simply the aggregate of all
those gullies, streams, ditches, tributaries, or rivers within an area of
land. So it stands to reason that everybody can do their part.
“I think there’s so little sense of the connection that
your daily activity has to your environment,” says Holland.
“There’s stuff everybody can do, from not washing your
car on the pavement, to picking up your dog waste.”
The collection of engineers and researchers now crowds
two offices on Main Street, and commanded a budget of just under $1.5
million for the 2001 fiscal year, with almost 90 percent of that money
dedicated to program expenses. Schueler is quick to point out that
big dollars are not necessarily a sign of success. “I guess we
measure our success in protection to streams and watersheds on the ground
– we don’t really measure it by how big our budget is.”
Still, the group is growing. After relocating to
Ellicott City from Silver Spring about five years ago, the organization
again expanded, taking over a neighboring office after about three years.
“We’ve roughly doubled in size since we’ve been
here,” Schueler says, adding that the organization is eyeing more
office space in Ellicott City to keep pace with their growth, while hoping
to maintain a relaxed, small-office culture. “We don’t
want to become the GM of watersheds,” he jokes.
Wear the Waders
The offices of the Center for Watershed Protection are
crowded. Boxes filled with books have been shunted to spaces not
already occupied by desks or people. Posters that range from overhead
shots of rivers to pictures of fish in their natural habitat are plastered
all over the walls. The dress code leans more towards the laid-back
“no shoes, no shirt, no job” side of the spectrum, but even
this demand seems malleable. “I don’t think
anyone’s worn a tie here in like ten years,” says Schueler.
There’s good reason. The staff here is
sometimes required to get dirty, as when they head out to sites to survey
streams. Saying they always love it would be a bit of an
overstatement. “Doing stream assessments in urban areas is not
necessarily fun,” says Anne Kitchell, one of the organization’s
watershed planners, as she leans back in her chair.
“You’ve got to be careful in those places.”
Kitchell explains, telling me that in urban water areas
there’s all sorts of trash and pet waste to be discovered during the
course of a routine examination, and the fear that around the next bend
lies a corpse seems to constantly loom overhead. “Not that
I’ve ever found one,” she jokes.
Dressed in jeans, a faded sweatshirt and work boots,
and seated in the office she shares with another Center employee, Kitchell
explains to me how she ended up in the relatively obscure field of
watershed protection. As an undergrad her background was in marine
science and biology, which led her to research in mud flats that she
unceremoniously explains as “blowing in worm tubes and measuring worm
poop.” But behind the dismissive comment lies some pretty heavy
science.
“When I got to grad school I realized
nobody’s doing how to control development at the watershed
level,” says Kitchell. She ended up writing a thesis with a
title that she approximates at “Managing Impervious Covers in the
Coastal Zone.” But she considers her current work with the
Center as a sort of unofficial graduate degree. “There’s
just not a school in the U.S. that sort of teaches that,” she says.
“I’ve learned more here from these people than I would
getting a Ph.D.”
Schueler, too, is a reflection of a range of subjects
that he applies to get the job done. “I’m one of those
composites of biology, engineering, economics, and planning,” he
explains in a way that makes it seem as though you couldn’t take two
steps without stumbling over such a composite.
Before founding the Center, Schueler worked in
Washington, D.C. trying to restore the Anacostia River, something he notes
is still being worked on to this day. Through his efforts, he
realized there was a niche out there for an organization to advise
communities on ways to protect their watersheds. And so the Center
was born.
Along the way Schueler has managed to bring those
interested, like Kitchell, into the fold, demanding from them a level of
multi-tasking that seems to be paralleled only by computer operating
systems. “It really takes like three or four years to master
all the skills on how to protect and restore watersheds, and we make our
employees learn them all,” he says.
Still, while there remains serious work to be done,
there’s always a joke within easy reach, says communications director
Holland. “We have a good sense of humor here.” She
pauses briefly. “We think we’re funny, and that’s
what’s important, right?” Right.